LONG LIVE PROLETARISM!RussianEnglishFrenchSpanish GermanFinnish
Long Live Revolution!
All Power to Strike Committees!

The Second Communist Manifesto (A.B. Razlatzki)
Introduction for Western and World Readers
Introduction (1999)
Part I: Bourgeois and Proletarian
Part II: Proletariat - Boss
Part III: The Crisis of the Workers Movement
Part IV: Proletarian Dictatorship & Proletarian Democracy
Part V: Classes and the Struggle for Socialism
Subscribe to 
USA, Socialism, Us...
State Imperialism Should be Distinguished from Economic Imperialism
Notes in the Margins of History
Turbulence in Social Development and the Stratification of the Superstructure

Подписка на 
Who Must Answer?
The Nature of Property A Scheme for Investigation
The Lowest Phase of Communism
Tendencies of the Current Moment
What our Intelligentsia does not Want to Know
Revolution Arises Amongst the Masses
Tendencies of the Current Moment

A.B. RazlatzkyTendencies of the Current Moment

A.B. Razlatzky


Every economic crisis is a consequence and manifestation of the lack of correspondence between the productive forces and the productive relations, of the accumulation of contradictions between them.

Every economic crisis is resolved only through a revolutionary transformation which brings the productive relations into correspondence with the productive forces. Even in the case where the resolution of the crisis can take place within the framework of a single social-economic system, the way out inevitably involves revolutionary changes. That is, even if the system does not change into another one, all the same, after the crisis it becomes something different, renewed, better in tune with the demands of history.

The economic crisis in our country, which had acquired a totally precise form by the end of the 1970s, but which had begun even earlier, is in no way exceptional.

All revolutionary transformations begin with the revolutionary movement of the lower classes. It is precisely their struggle, their unity which produces the social support without which any revolutionary transformation is impossible. And the movement below gives birth to those ideas which can succeed in a fundamental, revolutionary restructuring.

History offers no other paths.

It is true, history knows quite a few cases where an economically backward society resisted collapse through the use of force, that is through the maintenance of its social backwardness. But this never averted the crash and hardly even postponed it; on the contrary, the control of social development using force only deepens the contradictions, sharpens them in the extreme, and is crowned with the most powerful explosion and the most destructive consequences.

The crisis in our country may be characterized as follows;

1. The population must be fed.

The only real path, during the given period, to the resolution of this problem, was the continuous increases in the purchase of foodstuffs from abroad. Paying for all this fell to the non-renewable national wealth (oil, gas and other fossil fuels). But Russia is not Kuwait and can't keep this up for ever. Moreover, this path leads to the making of extortionate concessions, to the leasing of the continental shelf and so forth, all the way to a clearance sale of the territory. The social problems are not resolved, that is such methods cannot resolve the economic problems but, at most, drag out the resolution for a certain period.

2. The Programme for Foodstuffs

Initially (perhaps) this is being fulfilled, but only with investment and only on paper. Further, it turns out; the investment as a whole will not yield the output which has been projected, the output from the entire volume of investment will not exceed the current shortfall in agricultural production, that is, the shortfall will continue.

Based on this elucidation, two resolutions are possible. First, to give up the 'Programme for Foodstuffs' as a bad job and keep to the policy of intensification of the sale of our natural riches, which has already proven reliable (or to amuse oneself with a belief in miracles). Second, to strive for the planned results with all available forces, making additional investments. That is to divert additional resources away from industry. With such urgency, the desired indicator of agriculture production might be achieved at some point. But then, industry would be undermined incomparably more than the sum of the withdrawn investment, the collapse would be speeded up and, with some time lag, a death blow would be dealt to agriculture, liquidating all its achievements at one stroke.

3. The Collapse of Industry

The industrial slump, which took shape in 1977-78, will be continued. There is no reason for improvement; and the diversion of resources to the extraction of natural riches which are being sold, and to agriculture, can only aggravate the situation. It is entirely possible that, in the near term, the industrial crisis will make itself felt as a noticeable restriction even with the sale of national property.

The necessity of resolving the problems of industrial productivity plainly poses itself most sharply. And then the government (and by government we don't mean any formal body, but the group that actually rules, which to some extent coincides with the Politbureau) will be compelled to take the decision, which has already been knocking at the door for more than 20 years, the decision to broaden the economic rights of the directors. This decision, in the end, must be sufficiently full-blooded, since half-measures produce no effect. The government has no other paths.

There are no other paths, but this decision will immediately convert the directors into capitalists, since the remaining, necessary solutions have already been prepared. Among this "remainder" they have in mind two components;

  • statutes in the law on state arbitration which defend the enterprises (read - directors) from their ministers, i.e. from higher organs in general,
  • statutes in the Constitution, providing for the defense of the individual's right to occupy his position.

Having received a sufficient level of economic rights the directors were able to obtain such statutes, currently, practically unused, to safeguard their director's (read - bourgeois) situation.

Whether they will succeed in raising production in this way is unknown (whether a tendency to raise production will actually arise). But the government which takes such a decision, will be swept away with a great hullabaloo well before any such increase can take place. And, our country will get a new "directors" government; the dirtiest and most dishonourable in human history, extraordinarily uncoordinated, full of impudence and corrupt through and through. The measure of its bourgeois perversion can be neither expressed nor predicted.

A decisive step in the restoration of capitalism will be the destruction of the state monopoly on foreign trade, i.e. the appearance in the world market of specific enterprises and associations (read - directors; read - capitalists, owners).

4. Possible Complications

There are three.

First, monetary panic. Deposits in savings banks have reached 150 billion roubles, and there is even more money in the hands of the population. Whereas goods in circulation reach only about 60 billion or thereabouts. It will take only one sufficiently firm rumour about monetary reform, or even a noticeable, local disruption in commodity-money circulation for this entire avalanche of cash to bury the stores. And then, wild inflation, unimaginable jumps in prices and a transition to the most brutal normalization of goods in wide circulation (over which the present authorities have absolutely no control). For the economy this will prove ruinous, and the political crisis will be inevitable.

Second, there is the mission of the organs of state security to oversee economic activity. This is a terrible complication. In the briefest of periods, we can reach the point where, first the investigative and then the operational organs of the security services will be completely corrupted (as has already happened with the BKCC). This will be terrible because it will mean that not a single, healthy, centralized system will remain. It will mean that the crisis, ruin and complete collapse of production will reach terrifying proportions, and no suitable instrument will remain to overcome it (i.e there will be no forces actually capable of overcoming it), and all centralization will have to be rebuilt from ground zero.

Third, there is the possibility of war. The government may be pushed to unleash quite a serious war by the following primitive consideration; "The patriotic war, under conditions of destruction and evacuation, permitted a sharp raising of production effectiveness because of the patriotic upsurge, leading to a significant reduction in the level of satisfaction of demand. A patriotic upsurge is what we need, this is what can help us." There will be no patriotic upsurge, such a solution can only sharply accelerate the development of the crisis.

5. Counter-Tendencies

The lower classes react to the development of the crisis in their own way. They have long since perceived the crisis in production relations and answered it by adopting a devil-may-care attitude to production (this petty-bourgeois form of opposition, strictly speaking, also drives the economic crisis). They are answering the economic crisis with an ever more powerful organized revolutionary movement. Preventing this is impossible (that is to say that, in order to prevent it, it would be necessary to overcome the crisis, which is impossible). The development of the revolutionary process itself can proceed along one of the following four paths.

First, the revolutionary process could be led by the directors themselves. This they could do quite easily. Justifying themselves by the demands the workers had presented to them, they could point to the higher-ups as the cause of all the difficulties. But the first director who, together with his workers, stood up against the higher-ups would be cruelly punished by them since they have still not lost their powers. This danger is inhibiting. The victory of the directors at the head of the workers movement would lead to the establishment of capitalism in a director's variant, through the all-sided broadening of the rights of the directors, under the cover of some hastily embroidered, ideological veil.

Second, the movement might be headed by leaders of a more or less open bourgeois persuasion. For such a variant there are two factors; the possibility of pointing to the living standard in the West as a model, and the economic support of the directors and the entire underground bourgeoisie, which already exists and is continuing to grow. Victory along these lines could give birth to capitalism in any form up to and including fascism; the particular form will remain purely speculative until the crucial moment in the struggle for the support of the masses.

Third, the movement may be led by the pseudo-socialist (i.e. striving for socialist ideals, but unable to master the Marxist, materialist methods of assessment of social forces) leaders. Their slogans are always more comprehensible to the masses since their essence is; "We want everything to be as it is today (variant; as it was yesterday) only better for everyone and in all respects." If events are insufficiently sharp and the level of revolutionary activity correspondingly low, they may come to power. But then they will, at once, collide with the vast number of unresolved problems and will, once again, be compelled to resort the broadening of the rights of the directors, with all its attendant consequences.

Fourth, the workers movement may produce leaders who bases themselves on a Marxist platform. Here everything is clear. Depending only on the leader's level of mastery of Marxist theory, there will arise, as a result of such a victory, either a repetition of the transient form of socialism (similar to what occurred after the October revolution), or a more perfect form, taking account of the mistakes and guaranteeing the reproduction of the proletarian dictatorship.

The first three outcomes (in essence, the first two are purely bourgeois, while the third is petty-bourgeois) have a petty-bourgeois class basis; however, they will certainly not rely at all on the peasantry, but directly on the petty-bourgeois views of workers, on the economic struggle of the working class. Their development will significantly forestall the fourth outcome, since petty-bourgeois views have already formed in the working class, based on the existing productive relations, whereas the proletarian view will arise only to the extent that the organization of the proletariat grows, to the extent that is is united in course of organized struggle.

6. Real History

The tendencies and complications mentioned above, will collide, intersect and act together, at various moments and with various preponderances, to give rise to the particularities of real history.

It is necessary to note that the socialist revolution (the realization of the fourth revolutionary direction) can arise only as the continuation, growth and development of the bourgeois revolution. Accordingly, the milder the bourgeois revolution, the more likely and the sharper will be the socialist continuation. Even if the most favourable conditions for the victory of capitalism occur, afterwards the socialist eruption will be all the more inevitable. (And can also bring victory.)

7. The Peculiarities of the Development of the Revolution

One peculiarity is obvious. As a result of the lack in the country of any previous prepared, fully-formed political parties, none of these directions can have a stable, smooth provisional platform to any real extent whatever. All these directions will be formed from a wild chaos of ideas, where even allies and co-thinkers will not always be able to recognize each other. The longer this process of formation takes, the more profound will be the collapse.

It is possible to predict one further, altogether unique, feature. Upon achieving a broadening of their rights, the directors will (in the interests of production) carry out a sharp differentiation of the intelligentsia into those 'necessary' and 'unnecessary' for production. As a result, the 'unnecessary' will be left with the most miserly means of subsistence (or none at all) and will burst into the proletarian movement as a greatly embittered (though, in general, petty-bourgeois!) whirlwind, simultaneously strengthening it and importing confusion and chaos, infecting the mass with brutal, anarchist radicalism.

8. A Recapitulation

All this taken together shows, though it is superfluous, that we can have done with the economic crisis only through a revolutionary transformation. Accordingly, even a "revolution from above" is impossible without the support, in a specific form, of a fully-formed union of the lower classes. Practically (for the higher-ups) this signifies that, either the unity of the lower classes must be opposed with all available forces, dragging the crisis out and leading to its completion in the sharpest form, or assisting this union below (it necessarily will be directed against the higher-ups) hoping to rely on the rallying of the lower classes (after a split among the higher-ups) behind the carrying out of necessary reforms, while risking (and the further it goes - the greater the risk) at once coming into conflict with the masses, with whom no mutual understanding has yet been reached.

Revolutionary events are neither avoidable nor preventable. It is only possible to "manage" them to some specific extent, supporting one tendency or other and opposing the rest.

The interpreter on the English language - Perry Vodchik

| Stachkom of Samara | All-Russia stachkom | Photoalbums: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| Ours ICQ #42743890 | stachkom@mail.com |
Glory to the October of 1917!
Long Live New October!
Free e-mail address
Click here to earn from your web page
Make Cash on the Net
(c) 1999-2000 page did(made) Victor Kotel`nikov. Where that does not work I ask to prompt.
(Any kind of financial contribution is also appreciated)

be number one TopList


Last updated: